employer employee restrictive covenant employment dispute breach of contract litigation tribunal high court

End of Furlough Scheme – what does this mean for employers?

It is fair to say that the Furlough Scheme has probably saved many thousands of jobs, but with its end employers are likely to be faced by difficult decisions about possible redundancies.

The furlough scheme, which is the government’s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, is coming to an end this month. The scheme has, in effect, been a publicly-funded lay-off scheme and it has operated since April 2020. The scheme has probably saved many thousands of jobs in that time, but with its end employers are likely to be faced by difficult decisions about possible redundancies.

What is the furlough scheme?

Many employees have been furloughed ever since the scheme began, initially on a full-time basis or perhaps, more recently, on a part-time basis. Employers may well imagine that, once the scheme comes to an end and if redundancies are necessary, the obvious candidates will be those who are still on some form of furlough.

What should employers be aware of with the furlough scheme?

In pre-Covid times, well-advised employers would always try to select employees for redundancy having carried out a careful analysis of the skills required for the future of their organisation. They would have applied selection criteria that might have included an assessment of their skills, disciplinary record, timekeeping, flexibility and perhaps, as a tie-break, length of service. They would also have consulted before making those redundancies. With procedures of that kind, an employer would be well on the way to ensuring that they were dismissing employees fairly.

If an employer, in the current situation, simply selects those who are still on part-time or full-time furlough, none of that fair selection exercise is likely to have been carried out.

Instead, the majority of employees would have been furloughed at the beginning of the lockdown period, and then gradually allowed to come back on an ad hoc basis, as the employer’s work picked up. It is highly unlikely that employers went through a careful selection process before allowing employees back in that gradual way.

Risks of an unfair dismissal claim

Inevitably, those who were left on furlough (and then made redundant for that reason) will not have been selected for redundancy following a fair process. Employers could face hefty claims for unfair dismissal compensation if they simply select for redundancy those who are still on some form of furlough.

Next steps for employers

Employers should therefore ensure that they follow exactly the same sort of process at the end of the furlough period as they would in any other redundancy situation. Careful decision-making at this stage could save employers a great deal of unnecessary time spent with employment lawyers and the tribunal system.

City of London Specialist Employment Lawyers

We are based in the legal heart of London in Middle Temple (one of the four prestigious barristers’ Inns of Court) and provide the strongest employment legal advice with our breadth of complementary practice areas offering our clients a complete and bespoke service.

Some law firms only specialise in employment law, however, individuals and businesses instruct us because not only will our knowledgeable Employment team lead your case and protect your rights, but we specialise in litigation and can commence, manage or conclude disputes in the Tribunal or advise you in contemplation of litigation. Our Litigation and many other teams such as Insolvency or Immigration teams can be deployed and tailored advice provided for your particular issue(s).

Our complete UK employment law service includes: general business employment advice, tailored advice for senior executives and business owners, employment contract negotiation, advising on pay disputes, managing discrimination claims to complex high value employment litigation, mediation and compromise agreements.

LIMITATION ACT 1980 – WARNING

The Limitation Act 1980 sets out strict statutory deadlines within which you must bring litigation claims. Your legal rights will become irreversibly time-barred if you fail to take legal action (or defend a claim on time). Therefore, you should seek specific legal advice about your legal dispute at the very first opportunity so that you understand the time you have left. Failure to take advice or delay in taking action can be fatal to your prospects of success.

Please note that for regulatory reasons we do not offer any free advice.