Part-18-request-for-further-information-litigation-legal-advice-london-solicitors.jpeg

Requests for Further Information (CPR 18)

Litigants may consider that the opponent has not given sufficient information about the claim in pleadings. If so, a request can be made under Part 18 of the English Civil Procedure Rules for clarification.

What is a Part 18 Request for Information (“RFI”)?

Part 18 is a rule that helps litigants understand the opponent’s case. The rule is set out under England & Wales’ Civil Procedure Rules 1998. If a request for further information is not adequately replied to then the Claimant/Defendant can apply for a Court Order order under Part 18 demanding the information. The purpose of the rule is ensure understanding of the case and earlier cooperation and resolution.

Upon receipt of a statement of case (legal pleadings) or at any time in the proceedings, a party to proceedings may consider that those pleadings not provide sufficient information about the claim. A formal request can be made under CPR Part 18.1(1) for the other party to clarify or provide additional information in relation to any such issue.

An RFI or a CPR ‘Part 18 Request’ can be used to:

  • clarify a specific issue in the case
  • narrow the issues in dispute between the parties
  • give additional information in relation to a matter in the proceedings which has not been done otherwise by witness evidence
  • reveal weaknesses in the other party’s case by highlighting a specific issue which is not clear in the party’s statement of case
  • obtain an admission on a specific issue in the proceedings

The matter to which a Request for Information relates does not need to be contained or referred to in a statement of case i.e. a pleaded issue, however it should be relevant to the proceedings. Need help with making a Part 18 Request? Get in touch:

When can I make a Part 18 Request?

Before making an application to the court for an order under CPR Part 18, the party seeking clarification or information should first serve on the party from whom it is sought a written request for that clarification or information stating a date by which the response to the Request should be served.

Norris J considered that a request for further information arose as part of the responsibility of the court to manage cases and of the parties to co-operate in the just and efficient disposal of the issues between them.

An RFI can generally be made at any time during the proceedings. In Lalana Hans Place Ltd v Michael Barclay Partnership LLP [2017] EWHC 29 (TCC), the claimant argued that an RFI, made one week before trial, was made too late. The Judge allowed the request, holding that if an application went to an issue that was relevant to the fair disposal of the the trial, it would not be refused, simply on the grounds of delay. 

How do I prepare a Part 18 RFI?

Paragraph 1.2 of Practice Direction 18 states that a request should be concise and strictly confined to matters which are “reasonably necessary and proportionate” to enable the first party to prepare his own case or to understand the case he has to meet. Paragraph 1.6 of Practice Direction 18 sets out requirements for a Request for Information.

Responding to a Part 18 RFI

A response to an RFI must be in writing, dated and signed by the second party or his legal representative (paragraph 2.1 of CPR Practice Direction 18). The receiving party is allowed ‘a reasonable time to respond’ (paragraph 1.1 of CPR Practice Direction 18).

Like other statements of case in the proceedings, a response should be verified by a statement of truth (as set out in Part 22).

Objecting to a Part 18 RFI

Often the receiving party may consider an RFI to be disproportionate, irrelevant to the proceedings or a “fishing expedition”. If the receiving party objects to complying with the RFI or is unable to do so in the time allocated, he must inform the requesting party promptly.

If the receiving party considers that an RFI can only be complied with at disproportionate expense and objects to comply for that reason he should say so in his reply and explain briefly why he has taken that view (paragraph 4.2 of CPR Practice Direction 18).

There is no requirement to notify the Court but if an application is made, the receiving party must be prepared to clearly set out its objections.

Court order under Part 18 RFI

An application can be made to the Court for an order under paragraph 5 of CPR Practice Direction 18 and CPR Part 23, if the recipient does not respond or does not provide an ‘adequate response’. The application can be dealt with by the Court on paper, without a hearing.

Parties are encouraged to take a co-operative approach when it comes to RFIs and courts may encourage parties to provide information even where they are not legally obliged to do so if this would save time and costs.

“Only if any issues could not be resolved in correspondence, should they be referred to the court and, preferably, dealt with at the first case management conference.”

Berezovsky v Abramovich [2008] EWHC 1138

“It will be observed that the emphasis…is on confining this part of any litigation (in which costs tended to get out of control in the pre-CPR regime) “strictly” to what is necessary and proportionate and to the avoidance of disproportionate expense.”

The Court can direct that information provided under an RFI must not be used for any purpose except for that of the proceedings in which it is given (paragraph 18.2 of CPR 18).

Failure to comply with a Part 18 order

If you fail to comply with a court order to provide further information that are final orders, this can result in unless orders which can eventually lead to your case being struck out.

A receiving or objecting party must be prepared to give valid, cogent reasons as to why it failed to comply with a court order and respond adequately to an RFI.

Instructing our UK Litigation Lawyers

​We​ ensure that we provide the best possible outcome for our clients by conducting in depth investigation and research into the realistic prospects of a case before selecting the appropriate course of action in order to reduce time and expense. Liability for costs is always an issue in litigation and based on our extensive litigation experience we provide our clients with as much strategic, practical as well as carefully considered legal advice in order to ensure minimum risk in respect of costs. Where appropriate we encourage the use of alternative dispute resolution (such as mediation and without prejudice negotiation) and our lawyer’s negotiation skills are first class.

If early settlement at advantageous terms is not possible, we are extremely experienced and capable at navigating our clients through the litigation process.

First-class Second Opinions ✔
Discounted fixed fee advice.

Need a second opinion on your litigation? Our solicitors & barristers can help by assessing your case prospects. We have dual-qualified lawyers, so if our view is your case has limited merit or high risk we warn you in our first meeting.

Some firms offer free meetings with unqualified or junior lawyers and only after you’ve spent more do you get advice from a senior partner or barrister possibly that the case shouldn’t be pursued. Some of our professional negligence cases against lawyers are based on this type of possibly negligent approach.

We do things differently from all other law firms in England & Wales. We offer you partner and counsel-led advice in our first meeting, for a heavily discounted fixed fee. That way our best solicitors and barristers can review your litigation case and give you the correct advice at the outset, when it matters the most.

Legal advice is just one aspect of getting a solution. The most important thing is what you do with the legal knowledge about your case, how you present it to the other side and how you negotiate your way to the optimal legal settlement. Our lawyers are masters of strategically securing optimal litigation settlement.

Want your case assessed or a second legal opinion? Call ☎ 02071830529 or message our London litigators:

LIMITATION ACT 1980 – WARNING

The Limitation Act 1980 sets out strict statutory deadlines within which you must bring litigation claims. Your legal rights will become irreversibly time-barred if you fail to take legal action (or defend a claim on time). Therefore, you should seek specific legal advice about your legal dispute at the very first opportunity so that you understand the time you have left. Failure to take advice or delay in taking action can be fatal to your prospects of success.