The Need to Be Clear: Percy v Merriman White and Professional Negligence

In the recent case Percy v Merriman White and Mayall, the Court of Appeal clarified what must be proved by a contribution claimant to succeed in their contribution claim.

In the recent case of Percy v Merriman White, the Court of Appeal considered the application of Section 1(4) of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978. It ruled that the focal point for the provision’s purpose was the liability of the party claiming contribution.

The Facts

The Claimant (“Mr Percy”) had been given negligently advised by his solicitors and barrister (“Merriman White & Mayall”), thereby leading to a reduction of £435,000 to his settlement for his original claim. The Claimant brought a professional negligence claim against them.

The Claimant subsequently settled the claim with his solicitors and discontinued his claim against the barrister. In light of the discontinuance, the solicitors sought a contribution in the settlement fee from the barrister under Section 1(4) of the 1978 Act.

The Claim

Under Section 1(4) of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978, a party who has settled may recover a contribution “without regard to whether or not he himself is or ever was liable in respect of the damage, provided, however, that he would have been liable assuming that the factual basis of the claim against him could be established”. Relying on this provision, the solicitors sought to obtain a contribution from the barrister by attempting to establish his liability as well.

The Judgement

At first instance, the High Court held that the solicitors should be able to recover contribution in light of the fact that they had a cause of action against the barrister. On appeal, however, the Court of Appeal found otherwise. It held that the liability of the party seeking a contribution (the solicitors) is the only relevant matter under Section 1(4). Since neither the Defendant (the solicitors) nor the Claimant (Mr Percy) had mentioned any instance of the barrister’s negligence in their pleadings, it would have been unreasonable and impossible to comment on any role the barrister’s negligence may have played in the loss caused to the Claimant. The claim was dismissed.

The Need to Be Clear

Percy clarifies the law’s standing on contribution claims and the extent to which it may apply with regard to Section 1(4) of the 1978 Act. Most importantly, however, it shows the courts’ reluctance to allow a party to rely on another interpretation to recover contribution; a claim premised on incorrect interpretations cannot subsequently be amended.

The case does not affect the rights of parties originally affected by such negligence, however, it does highlight an important theme: the need to be absolutely clear when bringing a claim of professional negligence. Our expert legal team of leading Professional Negligence Solicitors & Barristers guide you through the applicable complexities relating to your professional negligence case, ensuring that you are able to successfully claim bring your claim in seeking recompense.

Download the Judgement

Successful Professional Negligence Claims

We specialise in professional negligence claims and have years of experience in handling and resolving negligence claims. Our lawyers have market-leading experience in providing bespoke legal advice and bringing complex claims to settlement.  As a leading law firm regularly featured in the news and media and with a track record of success, you can be assured your negligence claim will proceed with precision and care.

We provide the best possible outcome for our clients by conducting in-depth investigation and research into the realistic prospects of a case before advising on the appropriate course of action in order to reduce time and expense. Where appropriate we encourage the use of alternative dispute resolution through first-class negotiation. If required, we are extremely experienced and capable of navigating our clients through the litigation process.

Meet our Professional Negligence Lawyers

If you have a claim against a professional and want expert legal advice, get in touch so we can assess the legal merit of your case. We can often take on such claims on a no win no fee basis (such as a CFA or DBA) once we have discussed the claim with you and then assessed and advised you on the merits of the proposed professional negligence action.

Our expert legal team of leading Professional Negligence Solicitors & Barristers can provide urgent help, advice or representation to you. Just call our Professional Negligence Lawyers on ☎ 02071830529 or email us now.

LIMITATION ACT 1980 – WARNING

The Limitation Act 1980 sets out strict statutory deadlines within which you must bring litigation claims. Your legal rights will become irreversibly time-barred if you fail to take legal action (or defend a claim on time). Therefore, you should seek specific legal advice about your legal dispute at the very first opportunity so that you understand the time you have left. Failure to take advice or delay in taking action can be fatal to your prospects of success.

Please note that for regulatory reasons we do not offer any free advice.

Optimal Legal Results.

Our litigators deliver advanced legal strategies.

We analyse and work out the legal merits of running your case to trial. We calculate and advise on legal risk factors and the litigation rules in England & Wales. We factor in your risk-appetite, costs sensitivity and determination. Together, we plan the best possible result.

You’ll receive strategic legal advice from a barrister and solicitor at your first fixed fee meeting.