Category: Litigation

Realistic business finance documents, house model, calculator and coin stacks on an office desk, representing UK government-backed business loans and directors’ personal guarantees.

Government-Backed Business Loan, Personal Guarantee: Are You Still Liable?

A government guarantee protects the lender, not the director who signed. This guide explains how personal guarantees work under the Growth Guarantee Scheme, Bounce Back Loans and CBILS, what exposure directors still face, and where a guarantee can be challenged before or after a lender’s demand.

Hourglass and scales of justice representing the limitation period for liquidator claims after THG v Zedra

Can a Liquidator Sue After Six Years? THG v Zedra Explained

On 25 February 2026 the Supreme Court held in THG v Zedra that unfair prejudice petitions have no statutory limitation period. The majority also said the six-year rule for section 238, 239 and 423 claims was wrongly decided. We explain what this means for directors facing liquidator claims and the defences that remain.

A miniature house model on a legal document with stacked coins and a cityscape sunset background.

Have you been served with a Charging Order?

A charging order secures an unpaid court judgment against a debtor’s property or investments, and here we explain how the process works, what it means for joint owners, and how it compares to other enforcement routes.

Bankruotcy Petiion Set Aside Solicitor Barrister London UK

£115m UK Palace Insufficient for Service of NBD Bankruptcy Petition on Qatari

The High Court set aside a £16.3 million bankruptcy petition and alternative service order against a Qatari billionaire who owned a £115m property portfolio on Queen Anne’s Gate in Westminster. Property ownership cannot act as a procedural shortcut for valid territorial service when the debtor was residing in Doha. Substantive jurisdiction cannot substitute for a valid service strategy.

Legal Precedent, Appeal Process, Law Firm Marketing Content, Justice Symbol, Legal Advice, Lawsuit Reversal.

Winning on Appeal: Reversing Judicial Errors in Coghlan v Lexlaw [2026]

In complex civil litigation, lower courts can commit critical procedural errors, such as deciding an application based on arguments that were never formally pleaded by the parties. As demonstrated by the High Court’s ruling today in Arran Coghlan & Anor v Lexlaw Ltd, an appellate strategy that holds a lower court to the boundaries of civil procedure can successfully reverse an irregular judgment.

Primary Keywords Consumer Credit Act 1974 reform solicitors Consumer credit dispute lawyers UK Consumer Credit Act borrower rights claims Section 75 claim solicitors Unenforceable credit agreement lawyers Long-Tail Keywords Consumer Credit Act 1974 reform legal advice UK Challenge unenforceable credit agreements before CCA repeal Section 75 lender liability claims solicitors Unfair relationship claims under sections 140A-140C CCA Motor finance voluntary termination rights legal advice Consumer credit litigation specialists London High-Intent Keywords Consumer Credit Act claim before law changes Challenge lender misconduct under CCA Credit agreement unenforceability solicitor Consumer credit rights repeal legal advice LEXLAW consumer credit dispute specialists Borrower rights under Consumer Credit Act reform

Consumer Credit Act 1974 Reform: What Borrowers Need to Know

From outdated statute to FCA rulebook: the Consumer Credit Act 1974 is facing its most significant overhaul in fifty years. Automatic sanctions that have protected borrowers for decades are proposed for repeal, voluntary termination rights hang in the balance, and the window to enforce existing statutory protections is closing. Here is what every borrower needs to know before the law changes.