LEXLAW Solicitors & Barristers
Real Estate Tycoon, Tchenguiz challenged the £6.5 million claim by IG Index Limited over spread-betting debt but court upheld the claimant’s position. The ruling implicates critical precedent for financial instruments, spread betting, statutory interpretation of financial regulations.
The High Court, presided over by Andrew Lenon KC, upheld HNW Lending Limited’s enforcement of a £1.52 million bridging loan against property developer Nicole Lawrence, dismissing her claims of duress and unauthorised agreement amendments.
Manolete pusured a Direcors Claim against Director Norman Freed. The High Court ordered the director to repay £918,590 for funnelling monies to linked firms pre-insolvency, breaching duties under the Companies Act 2006 and Insolvency Act 1986.
The High Court ordered the Brown family to repay £522,000 after authorising improper payments whilst New Line Polymers Ltd faced insolvency, constituting a serious breach of directors’ duties under the Companies Act 2006.
This article uses the case of Sandra Blower v GH Canfields LLP to illustrate how judges in England and Wales reach decisions in civil litigation. Mrs. Blower alleged that Canfields, a London law firm, gave her inadequate advice regarding a settlement during her husband’s bankruptcy proceedings, where he faced liabilities exceeding £2 million. During a mediation session, Mr. Blower and the firm’s solicitor negotiated a £1.5 million settlement. However, Mr. Blower later attempted to back out of this agreement. The judge ruled in favour of the law firm. The judgment demonstrates the importance of evidence and legal precedent in the English legal system, as well as the weight judges give to the conduct and arguments of the parties.
The High Court ordered Norman Freed to repay £918,590 after causing Just Recruit Group Ltd to make substantial payments to connected companies while insolvent, breaching his fiduciary duties under the Companies Act 2006.
Businesses in London, UK are being targeted by a debt collection invoice scam email claiming to be from Lexlaw Solicitors (lexlaw.co.uk). These emails are FAKE. Spot the red flags and avoid falling victim to this invoice scam.
HMRC consented to the dismissal of a £0.5m winding-up petition against our client company, conceding their petition and agreeing to pay substantial costs. Our solicitor and counsel team successfully argued HMRC’s actions, including account freezing and misrepresentation, were an abuse of the proper process of the Companies Court. This case highlights the repercussions for all, including UK Government agencies, that engage in unjustified petitions.
A litigation funding report for the Legal Services Board evaluates UK litigation funding. It finds such funding can improve access to justice, facilitate consumer interest cases, and support a healthy legal market. However, it identifies the problems of highly limited, highly selective funding, potential cost tensions, and the need for robust AML controls.
An Account Freezing Order (AFO) is a UK court order that restricts access to funds in bank accounts suspected of involvement in criminal activity. Certain organisations such as the NCA, SFO or HMRC must show reasonable suspicion that the money is linked to criminal activity. They can apply for an AFO at a Magistrates’ Court. These orders, lasting up to two years, freeze the account, preventing any transactions without court approval. To protect their legal rights and assets, businesses and individuals facing an AFO can challenge or seek variation through legal representation.