IRHP Review Interest Rate Hedging Products FCA Review Bank Mis-selling SME Redress Swaps Mis-selling Financial Conduct Authority RBS IRHP Banking Litigation Financial Compensation SEO Keywords: FCA IRHP review scheme Interest Rate Hedging Products mis-selling SME swaps mis-selling claims FCA and bank redress process RBS IRHP compensation Independent IRHP reviewers IRHP review legal advice Mis-sold interest rate swaps Financial Conduct Authority swaps review Swaps compensation claims UK

Interest Rate Hedging Product (IRHP) Review: Confidential agreement between FCA and major banks published

The FCA’s confidential agreement with major banks set up the Interest Rate Hedging Product (IRHP) Review to address mis-selling claims. The Treasury Select Committee criticized the scheme for potentially allowing banks to avoid meaningful redress for SMEs, favouring banks over customers. The agreement details the redress process, but concerns remain about fairness and effectiveness. The Committee continues to scrutinize the review and its impact on SME lending.

The Financial Conduct Authority’s confidential agreement with several major banks, which set up the Interest Rate Hedging Product (IRHP) Review, was published today. The Treasury Select Committee has also expressed concerns that the terms of the IRHP Review has allowed major banks the opportunity to avoid providing meaningful redress to SME customers who have been mis-sold interest rate hedging products.

IRHP Review – agreement between the FCA and major banks

Andrew Tyrie MP, chairman of the Treasury Committee, commented on the publication of the agreement between the FCA and several major banks, and said:

These documents need to be in the public domain. The FCA took far too long to cooperate and did so only after many requests and persistent pressure from the Committee.

The agreement will allow those who are party to the redress scheme to examine the precise terms of it, in particular what redress should be provided to firms that were mis-sold these complex products. The Committee will want to reach a judgment on whether the process provides fair and reasonable redress.

The Committee remains very concerned that terms of the FCA’s redress scheme may, in some cases, have provided banks with an opportunity not to provide meaningful redress. Many firms feel that this process has unfairly favoured the banks.

The Committee expects to comment further on the scheme in its forthcoming report on SME lending.

The confidential agreement between the FCA and several major banks, establishing the IRHP Review, can be seen here:

Agreement relating to Past Sales of Interest Rate Hedging Products

Supplemental Agreement relating to Past Sales of Interest Rate Hedging Products

The Treasury Select Committee also published a letter from Clive Adamson, former Director of Supervision at the FCA, to major banks in relation to the IRHP Review, which can be seen here:

Letter from Clive Adamson to Major Banks about the IRHP Review

LEXLAW have conducted and settled substantially more derivatives litigation than any other law firm in England & Wales and are the leading law firm acting against banks in derivatives mis-selling claims.

We assess your case potential and provide expert legal advice. Get a clear path forward at our fixed-fee consultation. For optimal results click Check My Case below or call ☎ 02071830529

Check My Case ✔