Tag: UBS v Rose Capital | LEXLAW Solicitors & Barristers

Braganza Duty in UK Banking Litigation – Procedural Fairness in Focus.

The Braganza Duty in Banking Litigation (Implied Contractual Term to Exercise Discretion Fairly)

The High Court considered the application of the Braganza duty in a banking litigation context, ruling that the bank breached its procedural fairness obligations when exercising discretionary powers, reinforcing directors’ and financial institutions’ duties under UK law.

Post date 11 July 2025
Post author By Qasim Mehmood
Post categories In Banking Law, Case Law, Case Study, Court of Appeal, Director's Duties, High Court, Litigation, Media, Supreme Court
Tags bad faith banking decisions, banking disputes, Braganza duty, Braganza v BP Shipping, commercial contracts, commercial law, companies act 2006, contractual discretion, Corporate Governance, Director claims, Director Misfeasance, High Court rulings, Insolvency Act 1986, Insolvency Litigation, judicial oversight, LexLaw case studies, Litigation Funding, Macdonald Hotels v Bank of Scotland, Manolete Partners, procedural fairness, rational decision-making, UBS v Rose Capital, UK banking litigation, UK corporate litigation, UK legal blog.

The Braganza Duty in Banking Litigation (Implied Contractual Term to Exercise Discretion Fairly)

£115m UK Palace Insufficient for Service of NBD Bankruptcy Petition on Qatari

Winning on Appeal: Reversing Judicial Errors in Coghlan v Lexlaw [2026]

Defending Claims Brought by Liquidators: A UK Director’s Guide

Defeating HMRC’s £1m VAT Assessment

Consumer Credit Act 1974 Reform: What Borrowers Need to Know