Section 36 AJA 1970: Delay Mortgage Repossession
Behind on your mortgage and facing a court date? Learn how the court can give you more time, what evidence persuades a judge and why bridging loans are treated differently.
Behind on your mortgage and facing a court date? Learn how the court can give you more time, what evidence persuades a judge and why bridging loans are treated differently.
Directors who continue trading after they knew, or ought to have concluded, that there was no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation or administration may face personal liability under section 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986. During the period in which a company is insolvent or nearing insolvency, directors’ decisions may also come under closer scrutiny, particularly where losses to creditors increase.
When a creditor serves a winding‑up petition, the company faces immediate risk of frozen bank accounts, compulsory liquidation and director investigation. This 2026 guide explains the UK winding‑up petition procedure step‑by‑step, from petition issue and London Gazette advertisement through to court hearings, potential rescue strategies and the consequences of a winding‑up order for directors and stakeholders.
Sections 235 and 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986 impose powerful duties on company directors, officers, employees, and even third parties to co-operate with insolvency office-holders such as liquidators and administrators. Failure to assist properly during liquidation, administration, or bankruptcy can result in personal sanctions, court orders, fines, and even director disqualification.
A winding up petition can paralyse a business overnight. Bank accounts are frozen, payments become unlawful, and directors face personal exposure. A UK Validation Order is often the only legal remedy that allows a company to keep trading lawfully. This comprehensive 2026 guide explains how validation orders work, when they are granted, and why early instruction of specialist insolvency lawyers is critical.
An Account Freezing Order is one of the most disruptive financial enforcement tools available to UK authorities, allowing HMRC, the police and the National Crime Agency to freeze money held in a UK bank or building society account at a very early stage of an investigation. In many cases, the account holder has not been charged with any criminal offence, and may not even be aware that they are under investigation until the account is suddenly inaccessible.
A HMRC Time to Pay (TTP) arrangement lets businesses spread unpaid tax over manageable monthly instalments. In 2026, with HMRC enforcement increasing, well-prepared TTP proposals backed by financial evidence help avoid winding-up petitions, protect directors, and keep businesses trading.
A letter of credit is a powerful trade finance instrument that protects both buyers and sellers by reducing payment risk in domestic and international transactions. When structured correctly, it provides certainty of payment, improves cash flow, and limits exposure to counterparty default.
The Court of Appeal in London International Exhibition Centre plc v Allianz & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 1026 upheld the High Court’s ruling that policyholders can recover COVID-19 business interruption losses under “at the premises” disease wordings, holding that each case of COVID-19 at the insured premises formed part of the concurrent cause of national closure orders.
The High Court held that Paul and Joanne Rutter unlawfully reduced their directors’ loan account by £560,000 through a back-dated dividend and misapplied over £256,000 of company funds on their personal properties while Rut5 Ltd was approaching insolvency, breaching duties under the Companies Act 2006 and the Insolvency Act 1986.