LEXLAW Solicitors & Barristers
In a significant July 2026 ruling, the Supreme Court has confirmed that a director’s duty to act in good faith under section 172 of the Companies Act contains an objective element. A director who covertly pursues his own preferred outcome while misleading the board breaches his fiduciary duty, even where his motives are sincere.
The High Court held that Paul and Joanne Rutter unlawfully reduced their directors’ loan account by £560,000 through a back-dated dividend and misapplied over £256,000 of company funds on their personal properties while Rut5 Ltd was approaching insolvency, breaching duties under the Companies Act 2006 and the Insolvency Act 1986.
The High Court refused Sampson Coward LLP’s application for summary judgment in Manolete Partners Plc v Sampson Coward LLP [2023] EWHC 37 (Ch), allowing a £2 million claim concerning alleged mismanagement of escrow accounts during UK Property and Land Specialists Ltd’s insolvency to proceed. The ruling highlights the complexity of fiduciary breaches in escrow arrangements and confirms assignees’ rights to pursue breach of undertaking claims under the Insolvency Act 1986.
Unjust enrichment is a powerful remedy in English law allowing recovery where one party is enriched at another’s expense without legal justification. This guide by LEXLAW Solicitors explains how restitution claims arise in commercial, financial, and contractual disputes. We outline key legal principles, real-world examples, and common defences helping you understand your rights and take action.
As crypto fraud escalates, traditional legal tools like Norwich Pharmacal Orders may not be sufficient to unmask anonymous perpetrators. This article explores the limitations of NPOs in the decentralised crypto world and outlines emerging legal remedies, including Bankers Trust Orders, proprietary injunctions, and the Law Commission’s proposed free-standing information orders.
The High Court considered the application of the Braganza duty in a banking litigation context, ruling that the bank breached its procedural fairness obligations when exercising discretionary powers, reinforcing directors’ and financial institutions’ duties under UK law.
In Supreme Court case of Candey Ltd v Crumpler and another (as Joint Liquidators of Peak Hotels and Resorts Ltd (In Liquidation))[2022] UKSC 35 the question in issue was that under what circumstances will solicitors have waived (or be inferred to have waived) their equitable lien when a solicitor enters into a security arrangement with a client?
In a midnight deadline case, there is a complete undivided day following the expiry of the deadline, which should be included when calculating the limitation period. It is, therefore, crucial that limitation issues are considered at the outset of any potential claims.
The Supreme Court handed down its ruling in the FCA test case on business interruption insurance against six insurers. If you are an affected business, you should seek legal advice as soon as possible and our specialist financial services litigation team can be instructed to assist.
On 15 January 2021, the Supreme Court handed down its ruling in the FCA test case on business interruption insurance against six insurers . Many businesses will now be considering the next steps whilst waiting for their insurers to assess their case. The FCA has issued a letter setting out the next steps encouraging insurers to reassess, progress and settle claims quickly in light of the ruling.