Tag: COBS rules

cfd contracts for difference libor forex derivatives litigation solicitor lawyer barrister london city

FCA expresses “Serious Concerns” over Complex and Highly Risky Contracts For Difference (CFD) Products Mis-sold to Retail Investors

The FCA, following a year-long review, have published a “Dear CEO” letter addressed to firms providing and distributing products in the CFD market to amateur investors. The FCA…

Post date 18 January 2018
Post author By Jaron Dosanjh
Post categories In Banking Law, Bitcoin, Contract for Difference, Cryptocurrency, Derivatives, FCA, Financial Mis-selling, Financial Services Litigation, Litigation, Pensions, Professional Negligence, SIPP claims
Tags Banking Law, Bitcoin, CFDs, COBS rules, Contracts For Difference, Cryptocurrency, Derivatives, FCA, Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Ombudsman Service, Financial Regulation, Mis-selling, Negligence, Pensions, SIPP

rcj royal court justice lawyer london litigate cpr civil commercial financial litigation

Mis-selling of Unsuitable Financial Products: Credit Suisse Loses S138D FSMA Litigation Case

In Abdullah and others v Credit Suisse (UK) Limited and Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited [2017] EWHC 3016 (Comm), the High Court has given judgment in favour of private…

Post date 15 January 2018
Post author By Jaron Dosanjh
Post categories In Banking Law, Borrower Protection, Derivatives, Financial Services Litigation, Litigation
Tags Banking Law, Banks, COBS rules, Credit Suisse, Derivatives, FCA, Financial Regulation, Financial Services, Litigation, Mis-selling, Private Persons, s138D FSMA, Structured Products

Nothing left to load.

FCA expresses “Serious Concerns” over Complex and Highly Risky Contracts For Difference (CFD) Products Mis-sold to Retail Investors

Mis-selling of Unsuitable Financial Products: Credit Suisse Loses S138D FSMA Litigation Case

Quick Guide: s.994 Companies Act Unfair Prejudice Petitions

Challenging Possession of Property by Fixed Charge LPA Receivers

Short Guide: ‘Hidden’ or ‘Embedded’ Swaps

Court of Appeal Decides s.994 Petitions Subject to Statutory Limitation Period