Tag: Hedging

RBS announced a £700 million provision for Interest Rate Hedging Products (IRHP) mis-selling in their 2012 results, a 1300% increase from the previous £50 million. Despite this, RBS downplays its role in the scandal, highlighting court wins and Financial Ombudsman rulings in its favour, which contrasts with the FSA finding over 90% of such products mis-sold. The provision remains inadequate given the scale of affected non-sophisticated customers. Lexlaw advises anyone affected by RBS swaps mis-selling to seek independent legal counsel promptly. [1](https://lexlaw.co.uk/solicitors-london/rbs-announce-results-provision-for-swaps-mis-selling-increased-by-1300/)

RBS Announce Results: Provision for Swaps Mis-selling Increased by 1300%

RBS announced a £700 million provision for Interest Rate Hedging Products (IRHP) mis-selling in their 2012 results, a 1300% increase from the previous £50 million. Despite this, RBS downplays its role in the scandal, highlighting court wins and Ombudsman rulings in its favour, which contrasts with the FSA finding over 90% of such products mis-sold. The provision remains inadequate given the scale of affected non-sophisticated customers.

Barclays announce 2012 results – Provision for swaps mis-selling £850 million

Barclays Bank announced an £850 million provision for interest rate hedging product (swaps) mis-selling in 2012, with around 4,000 affected customers, approximately 3,000 deemed non-sophisticated. This suggests an average provision of £280,000 per customer. Lexlaw estimates that total liabilities for major banks, including Barclays and RBS, could reach several £billion pounds.

dark and secretive aspects of LIBOR manipulation at RBS, aiming to convey the sense of illicit activity, cultural failures, and the impact of the fine

RBS fined for LIBOR Manipulation; will lead to increased LIBOR Litigation

RBS was fined £87.5 million by the Financial Services Authority for manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), a key interest rate affecting trillions in derivatives contracts. This fraudulent activity, dating back to at least 2006, involved traders adjusting rates to benefit trading positions, causing losses to counterparties. This highlights serious cultural and oversight failures at RBS and other banks and will trigger increased LIBOR-related litigation.

The FSA’s definition of sophistication for swaps mis-selling reviews is complex and has caused confusion due to inconsistent communications. The original test deems a business sophisticated if it meets two of three criteria: turnover above £6.5m, balance sheet over £3.26m, or more than 50 employees. A new £10 million test modifies this for certain businesses, affecting their inclusion in the review. Clarification is expected from the FSA. Lexlaw offers expert advice to help businesses understand and navigate these rules. Contact Lexlaw for assistance with swaps claims.

What is Sophistication in the FSA Swaps Mis-selling Scheme?

The FSA’s definition of sophistication for swaps mis-selling reviews is complex and has caused confusion. The original test deems a business sophisticated if it meets two of three criteria: turnover above £6.5m, balance sheet over £3.26m, or more than 50 employees. A new £10 million test modifies this excluding them from the FSA review.

Here's an image depicting the FSA's pilot review findings for swaps mis-selling. It shows a scene with financial professionals looking concerned over documents, charts highlighting high mis-selling rates, and subtle visual cues indicating inadequate explanations, undisclosed costs, and over-hedging. The overall tone conveys seriousness and the implications of regulatory failure.

FSA Findings on Banks’ Pilot Swaps Mis-selling Review

The FSA’s pilot review of swaps mis-selling reveals over 90% of sales did not meet regulatory standards, highlighting inadequate risk explanation, undisclosed break costs, and over-hedging. Banks prioritised commissions over clients’ interests. The proposed review process raises concerns about reviewer independence and incomplete redress. Lexlaw advises court action before limitation periods expire.

Warren Buffett famously referred to derivatives as “financial weapons of mass destruction.” Lexlaw highlights the risks associated with derivatives and the importance of legal support for those affected by derivative mis-selling. If you have concerns about derivatives sold to you, contact Lexlaw for expert advice and assistance on protecting your interests.

Warren Buffett On Derivatives

Warren Buffett famously referred to derivatives as “financial weapons of mass destruction.” Lexlaw highlights the risks associated with derivatives and the importance of legal support for those affected by derivative mis-selling. If you have concerns about derivatives sold to you, contact Lexlaw for expert advice and assistance on protecting your interests.

china chinese insolvency chase debt unpaid invoice lexlaw litigation solicitors barristers in london limitation

Legal Comment on Green & Rowley v RBS [2012] EWHC 3661 (Swaps Mis-selling Judgment)

This judgment shows the complexity and fact-sensitive nature of swap mis-selling claims. The claimants were found to be experienced businessmen dealing with a straightforward swap, unlike many cases where claimants are less sophisticated and products are more complex. Key points include the importance of early document disclosure and careful handling of limitation periods. Specialist legal advice is essential to assess and manage swap mis-selling claims effectively. Contact Lexlaw for expert guidance and representation.

BBA british bankers association regulation financial services litigation regulation regulator lexlaw litigation

BBA Announcement on Major Banks’ Swaps Payment Suspension Policy

Major banks may suspend swap payments for financially distressed businesses while an independent review is conducted. Suspension is considered case-by-case and does not imply wrongdoing by the bank. Banks reserve their rights regarding suspended payments. Contact Lexlaw for expert help if you need support against UK Banks.

Libor Fraud UK Litigation Solicitors

Graiseley Properties Ltd (Guardian Care Homes) v Barclays Bank PLC – LIBOR Manipulation Test Case

This landmark case involves claims by Graiseley Properties and Guardian Care Homes against Barclays Bank, alleging mis-selling of interest rate derivatives linked to LIBOR manipulation. It was the first English court case to address alleged fraudulent misrepresentation by Barclays related to LIBOR fixing. The case established precedents on implied misrepresentation and involved extensive evidence, including senior Barclays management. Legal experts are available to advise clients affected by such financial product mis-selling.

yorkshire clydesdale nab tbl mis-sold interest rates swap break cost

Clydesdale and Yorkshire Banks’ Tailored Business Loans – Terms of ‘Swaps Mis-selling’ Review

The review of Interest Rate Hedging Products, including Tailored Business Loans, by Clydesdale and Yorkshire Banks in agreement with the Financial Services Authority. Customers who were not considered sophisticated at the time of sale shoul receive fair treatment and possible redress. The review is overseen. If you think this affects you, professional legal advice is available to protect your interests.