Tag: Litigation

yorkshire clydesdale nab tbl mis-sold interest rates swap break cost

Clydesdale and Yorkshire Banks’ Tailored Business Loans – Terms of ‘Swaps Mis-selling’ Review

The review of Interest Rate Hedging Products, including Tailored Business Loans, by Clydesdale and Yorkshire Banks in agreement with the Financial Services Authority. Customers who were not considered sophisticated at the time of sale shoul receive fair treatment and possible redress. The review is overseen. If you think this affects you, professional legal advice is available to protect your interests.

LEXLAW successfully represented a family business mis-sold interest rate swaps by Barclays, securing a substantial settlement despite initial negative advice. This case highlights the widespread impact of derivative mis-selling on UK small businesses, including sectors such as property, hospitality, and retail. Lexlaw offers expert legal support to businesses affected by such financial product mis-selling. Contact Lexlaw for professional advice and representation.

LEXLAW featured on BBC Radio 4’s The Report: Interest Rate Swaps Mis-selling

LEXLAW successfully represented a family business mis-sold interest rate swaps by Barclays, securing a substantial settlement despite initial negative advice from counsel. This case highlights the widespread impact of derivative mis-selling on UK small businesses, including sectors such as property, hospitality, and retail.

The Court of Appeal is a grand and imposing building, often located in the heart of a major city such as London. Architecturally, it combines classical and modern elements, featuring large stone facades, tall columns, and grand entrances symbolising the authority and gravitas of the court. Inside, the courtrooms are spacious with high ceilings, wood-panelled walls, and elevated benches where the judges sit. It has a formal and solemn atmosphere, reflecting its role as the highest court of appeal in England and Wales before the Supreme Court.

Court of Appeal Decision: Mobilx, Blue Sphere, Calltel

The Court of Appeal has clarified the ‘Kittel’ test in VAT fraud cases, ruling that the key question is whether a trader should have known their transactions were connected to fraud, rather than whether it was merely likely. HMRC bears the burden of proof to show the trader’s knowledge. This decision helps genuine traders defend against denied input tax claims, but full, robust responses to HMRC’s fraud indicators remain essential. Contact Lexlaw for expert VAT litigation advice and representation.