Litigation Lawyers in London High Court

RBS Commissioned Report Criticises Treatment of SME’s in Global Restructuring Group (GRG)

A report by Sir Andrew Large criticises RBS’s Global Restructuring Group (GRG) for its treatment of SMEs in financial distress. The report highlights GRG’s operation as an internal profit centre with opaque decision-making and poor governance. Customers often face unsettling decisions without clear recourse, lacking funds or expertise to challenge the bank. Large calls for a forensic inquiry into GRG’s practices to address conflicts of interest and improve the treatment of distressed SMEs.

lloyds bank london lexlaw litigation bank finance solicitor claims against banks lawyers london

Tomlinson Report Accuses RBS & Lloyds Bank of ‘Unscrupulous Practices’

The Tomlinson Report accuses RBS and Lloyds of unscrupulous practices through their turnaround divisions. It found the banks deliberately distressed viable businesses, charging excessive fees to force insolvency and acquire assets cheaply via property divisions like RBS West Register. The report describes these actions as systematic and institutional, damaging SMEs.

sky news logo uk litigation solicitor media lexlaw professional negligence

Sky News report on UKBA Immigration backlog featuring LEXLAW

The Home Affairs Committee reported a UK Border Agency backlog of over 432,000 immigration cases, with only a small reduction after years of delays. The UKBA has been replaced by two new bodies aimed at improving decision quality and enforcement. The backlog severely affects visa applicants’ ability to work, study, or access services while awaiting decisions. Clearing this backlog remains a critical priority for the Home Office.

Barclays’ appeal in ‘LIBOR test case’ dismissed by Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal dismissed Barclays’ appeal in the ‘LIBOR test case’ (Graiseley v Barclays), allowing claims that banks made fraudulent implied representations regarding LIBOR’s honesty to proceed to trial. The judgment rejects Barclays’ argument that there is no cause of action for failing to disclose dishonesty. The court held that banks proposing LIBOR-based transactions arguably represented the rate’s integrity. This ruling opens the door for LIBOR manipulation claims to be tried in court.

Britain’s New Banking Scandal

BBC Panorama exposes costly bank ‘swap’ scandal

BBC Panorama featured LEXLAW as we helped expose a major bank swap scandal, with widespread mis-selling of complex derivatives to SMEs. Despite a Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) redress scheme reviewing nearly 30,000 cases, only 32 businesses had received payouts at the time of the report.

lloyds bank london lexlaw litigation bank finance solicitor claims against banks lawyers london

The Times: Lloyds swap case settlement revealed

Our client was awarded about £1 million in a swaps mis-selling settlement with Lloyds after being sold a complex multi-cancellable swap they did not understand. The product allowed Lloyds to cancel the contract if interest rates rose, removing the protection at critical times. The case highlights how banks have been settling many swaps claims discreetly.

The Court of Appeal judgment in Green & Rowley v Royal Bank of Scotland EWCA Civ 1197 concerns the sale of an interest rate swap (IRS) by RBS to the appellants, experienced businessmen. The court upheld the trial judge’s finding that RBS complied with Financial Services Authority Conduct of Business (COB) rules, including providing clear risk warnings. Key issues included whether RBS adequately disclosed potential break costs associated with early termination. The court concluded the swap was straightforward, and the appellants were capable of understanding or seeking clarification about the risks. The judgment highlights the necessity for clear, fair communication in complex financial product sales and confirms that sophisticated clients bear responsibility for understanding such transactions. Lexlaw offers expert advice on swaps mis-selling claims and related litigation.

Court of Appeal Judgment: Green & Rowley v The Royal Bank of Scotland

The Court of Appeal in Green & Rowley v RBS confirmed that a bank does not owe a common law duty to ensure that customers fully understand the risks of interest rate swaps beyond the regulatory requirements. The case involved claims of mis-selling, particularly around inadequate disclosures. The court upheld that the bank’s compliance with the Financial Services Authority’s Conduct of Business Rules was sufficient, and the customers were considered knowledgeable enough to understand the transaction.

Directors of Virtuosi Limited were disqualified for a total of 18 years under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 for selling but failing to deliver tickets for major events while continuing to trade insolvently. The disqualification prevents them from acting as directors or in similar roles for the duration, with names entered on the official disqualification register. Lexlaw offers specialist legal defence for directors facing disqualification and guidance on court applications to act despite disqualification.

Online Ticketing Company Directors Receive Lengthy Disqualification Order

Directors disqualified for 18 years under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 for selling but failing to deliver event tickets while continuing to trade insolvently. Lexlaw offers specialist legal defence for directors facing disqualification and guidance on court applications to act despite disqualification.

Financial Conduct Authority FCA UK Logo - LEXLAW Litigation Law Firm in London

Interest Rate Swaps Mis-selling: FCA Publishes IRHP Review Statistics

The FCA’s update on the IRHP mis-selling review reveals severe delays, with only 10 final redress offers accepted out of over 30,000 cases after 14 months. RBS, with the largest review population, lags behind, still classifying many customers. Only 2% of sales have completed compliance assessment, with 93% found non-compliant.

SFO serious fraud office logo sign lexlaw litigation professional negligence tax insolvency prosecution defence solicitor lawyer barrister london

White Collar Crime Update: “Making and Accepting a Financial Advantage” under the Bribery Act 2010

The Serious Fraud Office has brought its first charges under the Bribery Act 2010 against a UK company involved in a £23 million bio-fuel investment fraud. This concerns the offences of making and accepting a financial advantage, where individuals give or receive improper financial benefits connected to the performance of their functions. Convictions can result in imprisonment of up to 10 years and substantial fines. The Act also includes corporate liability for failing to prevent bribery, though companies can defend themselves by showing adequate anti-bribery procedures.