Tag: Court of Appeal

Financial Conduct Authority FCA UK Logo - LEXLAW Litigation Law Firm in London

Court of Appeal assesses swap mis-selling complaint under FCA DISP

The Court of Appeal recently analysed a swap mis-selling complaint submitted by the Claimant under the FCA Dispute Resolution scheme (“DISP”), which complaint would stop time running for the purposes of a making a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service (“FOS”).

Litigation Lawyers in London High Court

Damages Based Agreements: Permission to appeal to Supreme Court refused in landmark DBAs case

In Shaista Zuberi v Lexlaw Limited [2021] EWCA Civ 16, the Court of Appeal has refused the appellant permission to appeal to the Supreme Court. This is a welcome and important judgment for lawyers and clients equally as it provides some much needed judicial clarity on the effect of termination in respect of DBAs in litigation matters

china chinese insolvency chase debt unpaid invoice lexlaw litigation solicitors barristers in london limitation

Damages Based Agreements: Court of Appeal upholds enforceability of DBAs in the event of termination

The landmark Court of Appeal judgment in Shaista Zuberi v Lexlaw Limited [2021] EWCA Civ 16 makes clear that termination fees are not caught by the DBA Regulations and any DBA including termination clauses is enforceable. The judgment paves the way for DBAs to flourish and enhances access to justice.

litigation court justice london lawyers

Peril of leaving (ineffective) service of litigation claim form to the last minute

Summary of the Court of Appeal judgment in case of Woodward & anor. v Phoenix Healthcare Distribution Limited in which Lexlaw represented the Appellants in place of their former solicitors, Collyer Bristow.

RCJ royal courts of justice london strand address lexlaw litigation solicitor professional negligence legal negligent claim advice no win no fee

The Price of Refusing to Discuss Costs: Court of Appeal backs issuance of professional negligence claim to recover pre-action costs

The Court of Appeal in Ayton v RSM Bentley Jennison [2018] EWHC 2851 (QB), has provided authoritative dicta on whether a claim can be issued, solely to recover costs, in…

The Court of Appeal is a grand and imposing building, often located in the heart of a major city such as London. Architecturally, it combines classical and modern elements, featuring large stone facades, tall columns, and grand entrances symbolising the authority and gravitas of the court. Inside, the courtrooms are spacious with high ceilings, wood-panelled walls, and elevated benches where the judges sit. It has a formal and solemn atmosphere, reflecting its role as the highest court of appeal in England and Wales before the Supreme Court.

Court of Appeal Decision: Mobilx, Blue Sphere, Calltel

The Court of Appeal has clarified the ‘Kittel’ test in VAT fraud cases, ruling that the key question is whether a trader should have known their transactions were connected to fraud, rather than whether it was merely likely. HMRC bears the burden of proof to show the trader’s knowledge. This decision helps genuine traders defend against denied input tax claims, but full, robust responses to HMRC’s fraud indicators remain essential. Contact Lexlaw for expert VAT litigation advice and representation.